JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 28, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Sala Plena

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Plena de la Corporación decide suspender los términos en el expediente RDL 012, correspondiente al control automático de constitucionalidad del Decreto Ley 700 de 2017.

Se dispone que dicha suspensión se mantiene hasta tanto la Corte decida sobre la constitucionalidad del Acto Legislativo 01 de 2017 (Expediente RPZ-001) y del Decreto Ley 277 de 2017 (RDL-006) y decrete la reanudación del proceso de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. SUSPENDER los términos en el expediente RDL-012, correspondientes al control automático de constitucionalidad del Decreto Ley 700 de 2017.
  2. SEGUNDO. Esta suspensión se mantendrá hasta tanto la Corte Constitucional decida sobre la constitucionalidad del Acto Legislativo 01 de 2017 (expediente RPZ-003), de la Ley 1820 de 2016 (expediente RPZ-001) y del Decreto Ley 277 de 2017 (RDL-006) y decrete la reanudación del proceso RDL 012.
  3. TERCERO. La Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional realizará las anotaciones correspondientes en los expedientes mencionados.
  4. Comuníquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

This decision has no citations or indexed topics in the Court's graph yet.